In <v04210101b41578834ee3@[204.167.100.139]>, on 09/27/99
at 03:41 PM, Robert Hettinga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Probably IBM will first want to see how attractive the technology is to
>punters. At least the approach of using an ancillary encryption chip
>should keep IBM safe from the nightmare Intel faced when it attempted to
>railroad CPU ID numbers on users.
No Code == No Trust!
This has all the security/trust problems that Intel's RNG does and more. I
wouldn't touch this thing with a ten foot poll.
---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.openpgp.net
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html
Talk About PGP on IRC EFNet Channel: #pgp Nick: whgiii
Hi Jeff!! :)
---------------------------------------------------------------
