David Honig writes: > you can think about using the bits. You should hash them before use, to be > safer. Of course this assumes that the cryptohash doesn't introduce exploitable hidden order. There should be a way to distill a physical entropy source into an equal-probability sea of ones and zeroes without using the algorithmic bottleneck.
- "unbreakable code?" with cash prizes John Gilmore
- Re: "unbreakable code?" with cash priz... Ben Laurie
- Re: "unbreakable code?" with cash priz... staym
- Re: "unbreakable code?" with cash ... David Honig
- Re: "unbreakable code?" with c... staym
- Re: "unbreakable code?" wi... Michael Paul Johnson
- Re: "unbreakable code?" wi... David Honig
- Re: "unbreakable code?" with c... Eugene Leitl
- Re: "unbreakable code?" with cash ... Eugene Leitl
- Re: "unbreakable code?" with cash ... Greg Reynolds