> I do not understand what is meant by "provably secure". An unfortunate admission for a would-be cryptographer. For what it's worth, this is a mark against your credibility and might mean that fewer real crypto types will look at your work. (And no, I don't qualify as a crypto type.) /r$
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and vide... eli+
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and vide... Eugene Leitl
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing... Steve Reid
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferen... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconf... Steve Reid
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and vide... amanda
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and... William Allen Simpson
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferen... Rich Salz
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconf... James A. Donald
- Re: A proposal for secure vide... Derek Atkins
- Re: A proposal for secure vide... RL 'Bob' Morgan
- Re: A proposal for secure vide... R. Hirschfeld
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and vide... amanda
- Re: A proposal for secure videoconferencing and vide... Lynn . Wheeler