At 11:59 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Alan Olsen wrote: >The >review of the system during the audit was less than nice, but they still >wanted to go ahead with it. Didn't they set themselves up for extra liability when fraud is committed due to their *now conscious* lack of diligence? Ignorance is bliss, and cheaper as well, when liability lawyers get involved. If you're not going to do anything about it, don't ask the question... IANAL...
- Re: migration paradigm (was: Is PGP broken?... lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Re: migration paradigm (was: Is PGP br... Enzo Michelangeli
- Re: migration paradigm (was: Is PG... Alan Olsen
- Re: migration paradigm (was: I... David Honig
- Re: migration paradigm (was: Is PGP br... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: migration paradigm (was: Is PG... Ray Dillinger
- Re: migration paradigm (was: I... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: migration paradigm (was: I... Rick Smith at Secure Computing
- Re: migration paradigm (wa... Arnold G. Reinhold
- DOD rescues Iridium Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: DOD rescues I... David Honig
- Re: migration paradigm (wa... Peter Fairbrother
- Re: migration paradig... Rick Smith at Secure Computing
- Re: migration par... Paul Crowley