At 18:23 21/12/2003, Carl Ellison wrote:
> >and it included non-repudiation which is an unachievable, > nonsense concept.
Any alternative definition or concept to cover what protocol designers usually refer to as non-repudiation specifications? For example non-repudiation of origin, i.e. the ability of recipient to convince a third party that a message was sent (to him) by a particular sender (at certain time)?
Or - do you think this is not an important requirement? Or what?
Best regards,
Amir Herzberg Computer Science Department, Bar Ilan University Lectures: http://www.cs.biu.ac.il/~herzbea/book.html Homepage: http://amir.herzberg.name
--------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
