On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:31:28AM -0700, Lance James wrote: > SecurID should not be the only concept for dependence.
Yeah, however, it is a smart device which provides a reasonable level of security in a very simple and almost foolproof way (I know a case where the users complained that it did not work. They had to be told not to type in the serial number engraved at the backside, but the number displayed on the LCD...). It's a pity to see it weakened without need to. regard Hadmut --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
