Kuehn, Ulrich wrote: > > >> From: Ben Laurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Do I understand correctly? You do want that nobody is able to >>> authenticate a message, however, it shall not be intelligible if >>> manipulated with? >> Correct. Minx (which is the only place I use IGE) avoids >> traffic marking attacks in two ways: >> >> a) all messages are "correct" >> >> b) any attempt to mark a message results in its complete corruption >> >> See the Minx paper, http://www.apache-ssl.org/minx.pdf. >> > Looks interesting! Have you looked at Ron Rivest's Chaffing and Winnowing?
Yes. Not sure why its relevant? -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.links.org/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
