[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Gutmann) writes: > What's more scary is that if anyone introduces a parameterised hash (it's > quite possible that this has already happened in some fields, and with the > current interest in randomised hashes it's only a matter of time before we see > these anyway) [...]
Both Rivest and Shamir said that they want a parameterised hash according to Paul Hoffman's "Notes from the Hash Futures Panel". <URL: http://www.proper.com/lookit/hash-futures-panel-notes.html > Maybe thats not so good after all. Or maybe the "not so good thing" here is exponent equal to 3... -- Jostein Tveit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
