IanG wrote: > 2. GPG + Engimail + Thunderbird. Will never be totally robust because > there is too much dependency.
What does this mean? GPG + Enigmail, whilst not the best architecture I ever heard of, is a tiny increment to the complexity of Thunderbird. Are you saying anything other than "big software has bugs"? -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.links.org/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]