On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:33:01 +0000 radi...@gmail.com wrote: > Iang wrote: > > >Why do we need the 1980s assumption of >being able to send freely > >to everyone, anyway? > > tech.supp...@i.bought.your.busted.thing.com is one that comes to > mind. i...@sale.me.your.thing.com is another. I think the types of > "prior whitelist only" secure systems being discussed on-list here > lately will in the long run win out with the lions share of > messages, but that bog standard 'dirty' email will persist for > commercial interactions of the type I list above.
On the other hand, tech.support@sillycompany could just accept all contact requests, at least temporarily. Perry -- Perry E. Metzger pe...@piermont.com _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list cryptography@metzdowd.com http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
