On 2013-09-30 14:34, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:12:06AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Not sure whether this has been pointed out / discussed here already (but
I guess Perry will reject my mail in case it has):
https://www.cdt.org/blogs/joseph-lorenzo-hall/2409-nist-sha-3
I call FUD. If progress is to be made, fight the right fights.
The SHA-3 specification was not "weakened", the blog confuses the
effective security of the algorithtm with the *capacity* of the
sponge construction.
SHA3 has been drastically weakened from the proposal that was submitted
and cryptanalyzed: See for example slides 43 and 44 of
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzRYQSHuuMYOQXdHWkRiZXlURVE/edit
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
