On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Seth David Schoen <sch...@eff.org> wrote: > Ben Laurie writes: > >> > How will the opt-out mechanism work so that it is not degraded by uses >> > clicking through a warning? >> >> Don't quite understand the question: if you have opted out you >> shouldn't get a warning, surely? > > I think that question was about unilateral client-side opt-out (users > ignoring security warnings) rather than the organized deployment of a > non-public CA.
Ah, well, I agree that having a reliable certificate infrastructure is not the only problem to be solved. _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
