On 2012-06-20 09:54:33 -0700 (-0700), Givonne Cirkin wrote: > curious, why don't some ppl trust link shortners? is that a > generation gap thing. > > 2nd. ur guesses are wrong. i was born in the USA. my parents were > born in the USA. my native language is English. [...]
Perhaps this is also "a generation gap thing." Professionals of my generation converse with colleagues and peers by using complete sentences and well-structured grammar. That same generation also prefers canonical URIs and other accurate bibliographical references/citations. I've been out of academia for a while, so perhaps the major journals have begun to accept submissions via SMS? To echo other responses on the paper, the biggest objection (aside from the minimal novelty of the subject matter itself) is likely to revolve around your "non-decryptable" terminology. Your method is clearly not "non-decryptable" to the owner or intended recipient who possesses the key/pad with which the data was encrypted, or else it would be useless. Further, no encryption technique is particularly useful when "decryptable" by unintended agents. As a result the term adds nothing meaningful in context, being either a logical contradiction or tautology (depending on your intended connotation). -- { IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.org/); PGP(43495829); WHOIS(STANL3-ARIN); SMTP(fu...@yuggoth.org); FINGER(fu...@yuggoth.org); MUD(kin...@katarsis.mudpy.org:6669); IRC(fu...@irc.yuggoth.org#ccl); } _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography