Jon Callas <j...@callas.org> wrote: > (The quibble I have is over partial security. My quibble is that lots of > partial > security systems label the partial security as being worse than no security. > I believe that partial security is always better than no security.)
Except when it is marketed as just "secure". A user with serious enemies whose system gives only partial security is better off assuming that the system is broken, and therefore guarding his tongue, than believing bogus marketing claims and compromising himself. _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
