On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 01:50:54PM -0500, Nicolai wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:20:35PM +0200, David D wrote: > > > TrueCrypt can be assumed "ok" based on Greenwald using it. If Snowden > > knew of a hole in TrueCrypt then Greenwald would not be using it. IMO. > > I don't think this is a useful criteria. After all, Greenwald probably > uses Windows, right?
Schneier uses Windows, too. http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/supported-operating-systems TrueCrypt currently supports the following operating systems: Windows 7 (32-bit and 64-bit) Windows Vista (32-bit and 64-bit) Windows XP (32-bit and 64-bit) Windows Server 2008 R2 (64-bit) Windows Server 2008 (32-bit and 64-bit) Windows Server 2003 (32-bit and 64-bit) Windows 2000 SP4 Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion (32-bit and 64-bit) Mac OS X 10.7 Lion (32-bit and 64-bit) Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard (32-bit) Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger Linux (32-bit and 64-bit versions, kernel 2.6 or compatible) Note: The following operating systems (among others) are not supported: Windows RT, Windows 2003 IA-64, Windows 2008 IA-64, Windows XP IA-64, and the Embedded/Tablet versions of Windows. > NB: I'm not making any claim for or against TrueCrypt.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
