On 12/23/2013 1:04 PM, Greg wrote:
On Dec 23, 2013, at 11:13 AM, D. J. Bernstein <d...@cr.yp.to> wrote:
Peter Gutmann writes (on the moderated cryptogra...@metzdowd.com list):
Any sufficiently capable developer of crypto software should be
competent enought to backdoor their own source code in such a way that
it can't be detected by an audit.
Some of us have been working on an auditable crypto library:
https://twitter.com/TweetNaCl
The original, nicely indented, version is 809 lines, 16621 bytes.
... what is the point of tweeting lines of source code? It's completely
unreadable (to me, at least).
Why doesn't that twitter account link to the "original, nicely indented"
version?
Does the original have comments? If not, why not?
- Greg
--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with
the NSA.
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
I feel that tweeting code has dangers. Congradulations on opening your
code up to security breaches.
--
Kevin
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography