On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 6:10 AM, ianG <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> They are published, typically... However they are buried...
>
> Firstly, they are not collected in any particular one place.
>
> Secondly, they use the internal language of audit...
>
>  Thirdly they are full of audit-semantics...
>
> Fourthly, they are commissioned by the CA, for the CA, of the CA, not
> for you, nor written with you in mind....
>
> Oh, and fifthly, they are dryer than a Mars rainfall survey...
>
> http://financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/001126.html Audit burial
> customs in 7 parts.


thanks for this!

it seems most things of interest require some reverse engineering,
however, this is still a nice source of empirical observations...


best regards,
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to