There are obviously a number of arguments that even Senators might listen to.

1) This Act actually creates two types of computers: those that comply with 
the Act and those that don't comply.

2) This Act artificially inflates the cost of a basic PC, making it much 
harder to install them in schools, or use them in other ways to educate 
disadvantaged American citizens.

3)  If this Act forces all U.S. vendors to comply with the Act, then it 
eliminates U.S. vendors from the international personal computer market. 
Overseas vendors will continue to build the powerful products we use today, 
which provide far greater capabilities than most user can harness. U.S. 
vendors will have to build more costly products that won't be able to 
compete against cheaper foreign products.

4) This Act prevents "garage shop" innovation in information technology by 
placing it entirely in the hands of established vendors. This kills the 
wellspring of innovation that was responsible for the PC revolution in the 
first place. Innovation doesn't happen if it has to ask permission first.
Rick.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]          roseville, minnesota
"Authentication" coming in October http://www.visi.com/crypto/




---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to