> Status: U > From: "Lucky Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Government subsidies: our last, best hope for Cryptanarchy? > Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 01:44:53 -0700 > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [...] > The same Cypherpunk expressed a hope that absent NAI's PGP, the German > government group currently funding GPG might be more inclined to fund UI > work for Windows. Perhaps they would. Assuming for a moment they will, > would this lead to a better PGP Windows UI than NAI's PGP offered? NAI's > PGP UI is pretty darn good. Looking at the sorry state of UI's currently > offered for GPG, even with government funding, I suspect that it will be > a long time indeed before we will see a GPG UI that will compare > positively to the current NAI PGP UI.
This may not be very relevant to the rest of the article, but: what's wrong with WinPT (www.winpt.org)? It looks quite good to me, and very close in look and feel to NAI PGP UI. Enzo --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
