Matt Blaze wrote: > Once I understood the basics, I quickly discovered, or more accurately > re-discovered, a simple and practical rights amplification (or > privilege escalation) attack to which most master-keyed locks are > vulnerable. > http://www.crypto.com/masterkey.html
Matt, is there some reason why you didn't bother asking a single locksmith if they knew about this attack already before claiming it was 'new' in your paper? Have you looked into the differences in actual costs of production of the various ways of making locks more secure? Do you have any information on how common various ways of breaking into locks are done in practice? I'm not arguing that security through obscurity is a good thing, just pointing out that your claims of the importance of your publication are being made mostly in ignorance. -Bram Cohen "Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent" -- John Maynard Keynes --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]