Hi zooko, I should not be suprised, but it kind of caught me off guard that:
1) VC++ and gcc were about 17% slower than Intel's compiler 2) gcc was lagging VC++ >From the paper: The experimental results showed that Intel's C++ compiler produces by far the most optimized code for all ciphers tested. Second and third place goes to Microsoft Visual C++ 8.0 and gcc 4.1.2, which generate code which is roughly 16.5% and 17.5% slower than that generated by Intel's compiler. Jeff On 1/10/09, zooko <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is a very thorough and nicely explained project of benchmarking > many algorithms X implementations X CPUs X operating systems X > compilers. > > http://idlebox.net/2008/0714-cryptography-speedtest-comparison/ > > Regards. > > Zooko > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
