It's not in Crypto++ yet. Do you need to have a fast implementation of Rijndael with 256-bit blocksize? I was planning to do an implementation of Rijndael that doesn't use large tables, and I can add support for larger blocksizes as part of that. Doing a fast implementation would be a lot more work.
-------------------------------------------------- From: "TimmyTurner" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 1:48 PM To: "Crypto++ Users" <[email protected]> Subject: Rijndael with 256 bits > > Hi! > > Could you schedule a Rijndael implementation with support for 256 bit > blocksizes for the next release? (Or does the library already provide > one and I missed it?) > > Thanks > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
