Timie Milie wrote: > I guess it might just come down to a matter of preference but while I > don't want a DLL dependency on Crypto++ (so I use it as a static > library) I don't wan't to use the runtime as a static library (as this > can be found on most computers). If I am not unusual in the latter > preferrence is it worth changing this default setting in the MVC > project on subsequent releases (not doing so creates multiple (re) > defined runtime function errors should anyone by wondering)?
You might want to reconsider this... VC6 was the last compiler that would generate code using msvcrt.dll (for non-static builds). There are actually 2 issues here - not only do the newer (starting with VC7 in VS 2002) MS compilers not use the older runtime DLL, the newer C/C++ runtime DLLs are no longer considered a part of Windows - so the newer ones do not come along with Windows service packs. And all of this is in addition to the weird problems that will eventually crop up with (if I understood you correctly) trying to build apps that use both the static and dynamic runtimes. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
