I guess some people didn't like SourceForge's native issue tracker, so they added Trac as an additional option. SourceForge now has a bunch of "apps" like Trac that projects can opt-in for.
Since Trac is available, and already enabled, I see no reason not to use it. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 7:36 PM To: "Wei Dai" <[email protected]> Cc: "Crypto++ Users" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: an issue tracker for crypto++ > On Sunday, 2009-12-13, at 19:01 , Wei Dai wrote: > >> It looks like SourceForge supports Trac. > ... >> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/cryptopp/ > > > Hrm, this is weird -- why does sourceforge support trac, when it has > its own bug tracker that is widely used? > > I had forgotten that Crypto++ uses sourceforge. Would it make more > sense to use the sourceforge-native issue tracker? > > I personally don't like it much (nor do I much like anything about > sourceforge project hosting compared to the newer alternatives), but > I would be willing to do a bit of admin work to maintain it. > Shouldn't be hard. > > Regards, > > Zooko > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ > Users" Google Group. > To unsubscribe, send an email to > [email protected]. > More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at > http://www.cryptopp.com. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com.
