Source code for all the ciphers for Crypto++ exist elsewhere too, so by that reasoning, what would be the point of implementing Crypto++ at all?
Since all the sym and asym ciphers are present in Crypto++, to me it doesn't seem like a huge ordeal, other than adhering to a few RFCs... I'm not too sure how much would be involved. Maybe it's a lot more work than I thought. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Mouse <[email protected]> wrote: > Given that OpenSSL exists - what would be the point [of implementing > something as complex as TLS in Crypto++]? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com.
