Thanks David, you are correct, I'm can be a bit punchy and loose track, 
apologies all.

It has been forked some time ago. Do you have a rough idea what I can cut 
out? Can link time optimization really be that useful? I'll have a look.

Regards,
Pierre


On Saturday, 9 March 2013 01:43:19 UTC+1, David Irvine wrote:
>
> Please stick to logical requests and answers this is a global mailing list 
> where English is not the first language of all involved (it is mine being 
> Scottish). It's OK if people think you are rude it just means please check 
> we have supplied enough info and/or could we be more specific. Anything 
> else is a waste of bandwidth. 
>
> In terms of a lite version of cryptopp I have not seen any, but it's 
> possible to cut down the number of algorithms if link time optimisation is 
> not an option then forking is perhaps the only option. 
>
>
> Best Regards
> David Irvine
>
>
> <http://maidsafe.net>maidsafe.net Limited is a limited liability company 
> incorporated in Scotland with number SC297540. VAT Registered 889 0608 77. 
> Registered Office: 72 Templehill, Troon, KA10 6BE. 
> Telephone Scotland: +44  *1292 317311*
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:25 PM, pierre l <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> No I am not really, I took my time to type to you the same thing 3 times 
>> after replying to you twice, if I was rude I would have said can you please 
>> read or open your eyes and look what I write and stop asking the same thing 
>> like an stuck record and not really helping me or anyone. That is rude!
>>  
>>
>> On Friday, 8 March 2013 13:35:14 UTC+1, Niknak wrote:
>>
>>>  Btw you are rude why should anyone help you?
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 8 Mar 2013, at 12:23, "pierre l" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Nick, I do NOT and have NOT had a "lite" = size-of-footprint version. 
>>> I'm still looking for one and that is why I posted here to ask for a 
>>> possible solution ("lite" version). I have NOT found a 
>>> smaller size-of-footprint version yet.  
>>>
>>>  I suggest you ask your performance iPhone texts when there actually is 
>>> one. And even then I will NOT be able to answer you because the 
>>> GetWord32<http://www.cryptopp.com/docs/ref/class_buffered_transformation.html#a69c064d931db3a8631c1138827d67e2f>
>>>  and 
>>> PutWord32<http://www.cryptopp.com/docs/ref/class_buffered_transformation.html#affcc574867d51528afe3c96721ded075>
>>>  **routines are anyways lightning fast for my application of a max 
>>> input/output size to the routines of max 64K.
>>>
>>>  Anyone else that have some helpful info for me?
>>>
>>>  Pierre
>>>
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  On Friday, 8 March 2013 13:06:35 UTC+1, Niknak wrote: 
>>>>
>>>>  Hi there,
>>>>
>>>>  Yeah I know what you were asking I just wondered if using the lite 
>>>> version effected your performance much, if not whats the point if the 
>>>> heavy 
>>>> version?
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On 7 Mar 2013, at 18:11, "pierre l" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Sorry Nick, in comparison to what? 
>>>>
>>>>  I'm asking if someone know of a "BufferedTransformation lite" which 
>>>> needs to have a small footprint, the performance is not really my issue, 
>>>> but rather the size library. 
>>>>
>>>>  So are there switches or knobs I can turn just to cater using 
>>>> GetWord32() and PutWord32() making things smaller or some subset of the 
>>>> library for my functionality needs or of another tool that will fill my 
>>>> needs?
>>>>
>>>>  Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> On Thursday, 7 March 2013 17:33:30 UTC+1, Niknak wrote: 
>>>>>
>>>>>  What's the performance like in comparison out if curiosity?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7 Mar 2013, at 15:27, "pierre l" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Should read "BufferedTransformation lite" as in not heavy. Yes, a 
>>>>> light went off in my head:-)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, 7 March 2013 15:40:34 UTC+1, pierre l wrote: 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I'm using 
>>>>>> BufferedTransformation<http://www.cryptopp.com/docs/ref/class_buffered_transformation.html>
>>>>>>  **and find it to increase my binary size from 200k to 8Mb. Size is 
>>>>>> very imported in my application so this will not do for me. 
>>>>>> I'm only calling 
>>>>>> GetWord32<http://www.cryptopp.com/docs/ref/class_buffered_transformation.html#a69c064d931db3a8631c1138827d67e2f>
>>>>>>  and 
>>>>>> PutWord3**2<http://www.cryptopp.com/docs/ref/class_buffered_transformation.html#affcc574867d51528afe3c96721ded075>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  Does anyone know if there are some BufferedTransformation lite out 
>>>>>> there or what I can do create a smaller version somehow?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Thanks in advance
>>>>>> Pierre
>>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>    -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ 
>>>> Users" Google Group.
>>>> To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-use...@googlegroups.**com.
>>>> More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
>>>> http://www.cryptopp.com.
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Crypto++ Users" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to cryptopp-user...@googlegroups.**com.
>>>> For more options, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>>> .
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>   -- 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ 
>>> Users" Google Group.
>>> To unsubscribe, send an email to cryptopp-use...@**googlegroups.com.
>>> More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
>>> http://www.cryptopp.com.
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Crypto++ Users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to cryptopp-user...@**googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>> .
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>   -- 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ 
>> Users" Google Group.
>> To unsubscribe, send an email to 
>> [email protected]<javascript:>
>> .
>> More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
>> http://www.cryptopp.com.
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Crypto++ Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" 
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected].
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
http://www.cryptopp.com.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to