On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 6:25 PM, David Irvine <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it is worthwhile looking at the details of unique_ptr and > differences. Howard Hinnant describes this well and provides an > implementation of unique_ptr for c++03. May be overkill and as crypto++ use > of auto_ptr is limited and potentially safer than usual, maybe an ifdef > block could be used although template typedefs are really also a c++11 > feature, so care required AFAIK cross compiler with such a feature in c++03 > implementations. > > Anyway this link is worth a read > https://howardhinnant.github.io/unique_ptr03.html
That works for me too (if the community is happy with it). Patches are welcomed :) We can put it to bed immediately. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
