Am 07.03.2016 um 13:06 schrieb Andrés Garagiola:
> I've been adding a few log lines to my code and I found where I have
> the problem.
>
Could you please post the keypairs that cause the problems?

> I'm generating a lot of key pairs aprox. 2.000.000 (with less key
> pairs 1K, 10K or 100K no problem occurs) my program close trying
> create a public key after initialize the private key:
>
>  privateKey.Initialize(rng, params);
>  privateKey.MakePublicKey(publicKey); // <<- Here my program raise an
> 'Unhandled Exception' and died
>
> My question is could be my problem that the previously created private
> key is bad?
We may indeed have some borderline issue in our generation code and I'd
like to confirm that.
> Adding a validation of the private key before create the public key
> could I detect the problem?
>
> I'm creating keys using my program, no external keys are loaded so
> could I validate the keys in level 0?
Level 0 should suffice, depending on the cause of the issue, you may
want to try to sequentially increase  the level if you can't detect the
issue.
> Is enough to detect the problem? I detected that level 2 or 3 is very
> slow to my volume of keys.
>
> Once that the bad key is detected, is right try again?
Apparently chances will be that trying again will yield a "better" key.
>
> Thank you very much
> Regards
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 9:42:43 PM UTC-3, Andrés Garagiola wrote:
>
>     | To ensure you actually loaded genuine keys that haven't been
>     damaged since last use and to ensure that everything is operational.
>
>     Right. But I'm creating new keys using CryptoPP. Why I should
>     distrust of this keys?
>
>     When I execute my key generation process with many keys (2.000.000
>     key pairs request) I found and error (Segmentation fault error).
>     Could it be related with a not validated key?
>
>
>
>     On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 5:02:34 PM UTC-3, Andrés Garagiola wrote:
>
>         I'm seeing a few examples where after create keys it are
>         validated. What is the reason to do it? What kind of problem
>         without validate the keys?
>
>         bool GeneratePublicKey( const ECDSA<ECP, SHA1>::PrivateKey&
>         privateKey, ECDSA<ECP, SHA1>::PublicKey& publicKey )
>         {
>             AutoSeededRandomPool prng;
>
>             // Sanity check
>             assert( *privateKey.Validate( prng, 3 )* );
>
>             privateKey.MakePublicKey(publicKey);
>             assert( *publicKey.Validate( prng, 3 )* );
>
>             return*publicKey.Validate( prng, 3 );*
>         }
>
>         What's means the level?
>
>         I'm looking this wiki page
>         
> https://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/Elliptic_Curve_Digital_Signature_Algorithm
>         
> <https://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/Elliptic_Curve_Digital_Signature_Algorithm>
>         but the explanation about validation is not included with the
>         examples.
>
>         Regards
>
> -- 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++
> Users" Google Group.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to
> [email protected].
> More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at
> http://www.cryptopp.com.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Crypto++ Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" 
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected].
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
http://www.cryptopp.com.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to