> I think we are at the point we can merge arm-neon and windows-store into 
> master.
>
> Both arm-neon and windows-store are clean compiling as separate branches. 
> I've tested arm-neon on-device, and its testing OK. I believe Геннадий has 
> tested windows-store on-device given the patches he has submitted.
>
> I also hand merged arm-neon into windows-store and tested a compile. The 
> combination tested OK. (As a side note, Visual Studio 2012 compilers and 
> above can consume NEON intrinsics, so BLAKE2_NEON_Compress32 and 
> BLAKE2_NEON_Compress64 are cross-platform. I also understand Microsoft's 
> compiler is quite good at optimizing for NEON, so I expect the benchmark 
> numbers for BLAKE2 will be very good for Windows Phone and Windows Store).
>
> Does anyone have any objections to merging arm-neon and windows-store into 
> master?
>

The detection code was checked-in at 
http://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/commit/01f77765d4387009d72b49f17721ddf103a0e753.
 
The detection code only recognizes ARM, NEON, Windows Phone and Windows 
Store; and it only affects config.h, config.recommend, cpu.h and cpu.cpp.

Adding the detection code to Master early makes it easier to test 
combinations like arm-neon merged into windows-store. It also allows us to 
test other unrelated source files, like SHA and ARMv8-a.

The "meat and potatoes" of arm-neon and windows-store are the changes to 
source files, and they will be checked-in once it appears its OK.

Jeff

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" 
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected].
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
http://www.cryptopp.com.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to