Hi Jeffrey,

Yes, version commit is 8fa8ec9913ccd2ce44f71014322ddb7e198fef68 from yesterday.
It used to work before

Regression range is Cryptopp: 
b3eb4c6a690d6dfb342856f2a66a71dcec8c429b:a01711e347df30a994609537ce9be2926a366a44

Regards,
Philippe

> Le 26 août 2019 à 22:08, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 2:30 PM Philippe Antoine
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> My same is Philippe Antoine.
>> I have been doing differential fuzzing about elliptic curve cryptography 
>> with different libraries including cryptopp.
>> 
>> On August the 6th, oss-fuzz found the first regression after about one year.
>> I think this is dut to commit 
>> https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/commit/c9ef9420e762b91cc06463d349cf06e04c749b9d
>> 
>> My output is the following
>> 
> point=04202020202020ffffff2020202020200020ffffffff20202020ff20ff20ff200104c8423eb699c3ace2e623855cb9238cb43971464f4b6686765c46ed4ce035dc
>> 
> bignum=000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000a
>> 
> mbedlts:045de6bae41907dbe3f0aa32b272add6b92fb2b79fdc49af35fb844be1c4c629e899295109c41cfe76a9c06c23d95b2d4be3b6f61a476acf1a67a0d848abba89e1
>> 
> libecc:045de6bae41907dbe3f0aa32b272add6b92fb2b79fdc49af35fb844be1c4c629e899295109c41cfe76a9c06c23d95b2d4be3b6f61a476acf1a67a0d848abba89e1
>> 
> libecc:045de6bae41907dbe3f0aa32b272add6b92fb2b79fdc49af35fb844be1c4c629e899295109c41cfe76a9c06c23d95b2d4be3b6f61a476acf1a67a0d848abba89e1
>> 
> openssl:045de6bae41907dbe3f0aa32b272add6b92fb2b79fdc49af35fb844be1c4c629e899295109c41cfe76a9c06c23d95b2d4be3b6f61a476acf1a67a0d848abba89e1
>> 
> gcrypt:045de6bae41907dbe3f0aa32b272add6b92fb2b79fdc49af35fb844be1c4c629e899295109c41cfe76a9c06c23d95b2d4be3b6f61a476acf1a67a0d848abba89e1
>> 
> cryptopp:0407f16bad8b16f5441f1a15f8e7eca364d97bb3a3c09b320bb9807ee26857b66f882ba526e55ebbf22342ae5a0186ed0ca1db8870fd001c63ae36dc72ee15f6e7
>> 
>> That means when I multiply by 10 the point on the curve brainpoolP256r1
>> 
>> x = 202020202020ffffff2020202020200020ffffffff20202020ff20ff20ff2001
>> 
>> y = 04c8423eb699c3ace2e623855cb9238cb43971464f4b6686765c46ed4ce035dc
>> 
>> I get a different result than all the other libraries
>> 
>> I will look into it a bit more, but I already wanted to let you know this...
> 
> Thanks Philippe.
> 
> Yeah, that's not good. Does your test include a fresh check-out and
> build of the Crypto++ library?
> 
> Jeff

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "Crypto++ Users". More 
information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
http://www.cryptopp.com and 
http://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/cryptopp-users.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cryptopp-users/6FF181DB-7E96-4163-8F70-4BC1C2139B2E%40catenacyber.fr.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to