I think Drupal would be a better choice than > Mediawiki, as it is much easier to make it feel like a "normal" site, > and not like a slightly mis-used wiki.
There are many reasons to not try to switch to another Content Management System, Frank has listed many of them on the mailing list during this last year. It's therefore probably better to not switch to something else unless really needed. Keeping MediaWiki can seem less easy to manage, but I guess that all the problems that may arise while switching to another CMS can overtake this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Crystal-main mailing list Crystal-main@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main Unsubscribe: mailto:crystal-main-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe
