On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 12:20 +0100, Dan Walters wrote: > Bringing the library into the project as a header / source only > include and committing to the CEL repository is an option? If so, this > should be a very easy task and make configuring compiling much easier. > I can add this to my proposal.
No, that's OK, I'll try to do this ASAP in order to be included in 2.0. > As you have previously said, the library works well, is tested and if > it can be included in CEL then I cannot see changing TCP library would > provide anything. Changing library probably wouldn't give anything > back and would be a step back in terms of making progress? Yes, if we bump the library into CEL and there's no other problems about portability or whatsoever, then there are no reasons to switch to something else. We'll see that later. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev _______________________________________________ Crystal-main mailing list Crystal-main@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main Unsubscribe: mailto:crystal-main-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe
