On behalf of Microsoft, I vote “YES” on CSC-26.

Cheers,
Ian

From: Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-boun...@cabforum.org> On Behalf Of Martijn 
Katerbarg via Cscwg-public
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 12:31 PM
To: cscwg-public@cabforum.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Cscwg-public] [Voting Period Begins] CSC-26 Timestamping 
Private Key Protection


Purpose of the Ballot
This ballot updates the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management 
of Publicly‐Trusted Code Signing Certificates“ version 3.7 in order to clarify 
language regarding Timestamp Authority Private Key Protection. The main goals 
of this ballot are to:

  1.  Require Timestamp Authority Subordinate CA Private Keys to be stored in 
offline HSMs
  2.  Add a requirement to remove Private Keys associated with Timestamp 
Certificates after a 18 months
  3.  Add a requirement to reject SHA-1 timestamp requests
The following motion has been proposed by Martijn Katerbarg of Sectigo and 
endorsed by Bruce Morton of Entrust and Ian McMillan of Microsoft.

MOTION BEGINS

This ballot updates the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management 
of Publicly‐Trusted Code Signing Certificates” ("Code Signing Baseline 
Requirements") based on version 3.7. MODIFY the Code Signing Baseline 
Requirements as specified in the following redline: 
https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/d431d9104094f2b89f35ed4bf1d64b9a844e762b...12130ff7c2b41d795d47925c084780ea0f7328cd

MOTION ENDS
The procedure for this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days)

  *   Start Time: 2024-06-13 16:30 UTC
  *   End Time: 2024-06-20 16:30 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)

  *   Start Time: 2024-06-20 16:30 UTC
  *   End Time: 2024-06-27 16:30 UTC


_______________________________________________
Cscwg-public mailing list
Cscwg-public@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public

Reply via email to