> Though this is actually off-topic, I don't believe title is there for > accessibility at all (unless browsers for the disabled read them). > However, alt tags are displayed if the image can't be loaded. This may > be due to the person being disabled, or it may just be that the person > viewing your site prefers to have images turned off.
Per definition belief is the absense of proof. Both title and alt _attributes_ (they are *not* tags) are very important for accessibility and assistive technology, the former is the replacement for the image, the latter information about the image. The last option is the longdesc attribute, for really complex images. Good image info: http://www.joeclark.org/book/sashay/serialization/Chapter06.html Now can this thread please die? It is not on topic and hovers in between accessibility and SEO at the moment. -- Chris Heilmann Blog: http://www.wait-till-i.com Writing: http://icant.co.uk/ Binaries: http://www.onlinetools.org/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
