David Laakso wrote: > On Sun, 08 May 2005 06:12:32 -0400, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://gsasmart payconference.com *(take the space out between smart > > and conference; dont want this message to be searchable.)* > > I guess what I'm asking here is for any info regarding how I could of > > coded the site better/differently/more semantically, etc, etc. > > It had to be fully standards compliant and accessible so some extra > > coding was involved. > aside: The 80% font-size on the text is a bit tough on us older folks with > a wide monitor-- would you consider setting that selector to default and > reducing the line-height accordingly? David's right. If accessible matters to you, then don't mess with paragraph text size. Not only do you make it 64% (p {font: 80%/...} -> (100%-sqrt(100%^2-80%^2)) http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/area80.html) for people who have never adjusted their default size to their needs, you also do it to those who've reduced it to suit their needs, and those who've increased it to suit their needs (http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/tmp/Images/gsasmart1.gif). You can kid yourself all you want that increased leading makes text more readable (accessible), but if you really want text to be more readable, the most reliable way is big enough text. Assuming the default is big enough is a friendly and accessible way to do that. Assuming that text the same size as menu text is is not (http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/defaultsize.html#note1). -- "Through Him all things were made; without Him nothing was made that has been made." John 1:3 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
