jack fredricks schrieb:
if it's an IE (only) hack, should it be escaped for IE (only)?
Hmm, in my percentages demo I encountered the problem, and worked this
out for me: background-position:1%; because constructs like
#menu a:hover .menuItemBracket {color:#ff0000;}
seem not to inform IE about the fact that it must redraw the container
on hover.
Yes, I think it should be commented like the Holly Hack, but I don't
know if IEmac suffers from the same problem.
/* to insist on a redraw in IE6, hide from IE-mac \*/
* html #menu a:hover {background-position: 0 0;}
/* end hide */
might be less worse when there is already a background-image. :)
I don't know if anyone uses this position-form of the "hack", or if this
is a hack at all. I think it's a common little problem, and I saw other
workarounds like changing the text-decoration, or the background-color.
It's just important to find a solution that indicates a change to IE and
doesn't interact too much.
Ingo
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/