Guys and gals,
thanks very much for your input (and Adam, for bringing the thread back
on topic)
yours and Christians suggestion of designating structural ID's was the
consensus that we reached in our last scoping session as the potential
for an, as you put it 'dangerous' development environment has to be the
primary concern.
Interestingly, during the exploration of this issue, we seem to have
come full circle: Settling on using ID's for structural elements (i.e.
elements that do not require being dynamically driven) and classes for
everything else has in fact rendered the initial point mute, and brought
us back to the correct semantic use of these functions.
How elegant... in a messy kind of way!
Anyway, result! and the lists input was invaluable.
cheers
Mike
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
