Stevio: > The table solution is so much more reliable, robust, doesn't > break, and does what it says on the tin.
yep, that's precisely the conclusion I came to. As a programmer, I *do* want to do things properly, but sometimes the "correct" way is way more painful than it should be. Maybe it's a case of the old not-quite-mature-until-version-3 syndrome - I believe CSS3 has explicit specifications for multi column layouts. Did you try Holly's 49% solution? That looked nice and clean. Rob ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
