> Scott, I meant that I wanted to know the source of the statement "em is > better than % because of IE goof-ups." I don't know this to be true, so > if you can tell us where you heard this from we can take a look and see > if they have wrong information, know something we don't know, or if you > just misunderstood them. >
>From a user from webdesign-l mailing list: 3-% is a poor method of setting width on #menulist. The LIs are obviously meant to be single-line items, but don't necessarily fit in the width-unknown 17%. Also, the background image won't necessarily fit that way either. Instead, set its width in ems. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
