Allison Bloodworth wrote: >Hi Franky, > >This is great--thank you! I'm hoping to incorporate as many of your >suggestions as we can. One small correction: I believe you based the >revision you did was based on this page: >http://mms.media.berkeley.edu:8901/UCBCNUsabilityMockups/Gateway/New/sports- >ucb-nested.htm, not this (old) one: >http://www.berkeley.edu/test/calendar-tabs/sports-tabs-1.html. > Glad you can use it. :-) - Yes: I saw the newer version later on; and because my testing was just an example, I didn't worry to much.
>Unfortunately I can't use FANGS with Firefox 1.5, but on a 12/18 post on the >Fangs site it looks like they will be finishing a version for FF 1.5 soon. I >had actually downloaded FANGS previously, but am not sure I ever used it. > > Yes again: they promise "really soon now" and "as soon as possible" (but didn't mention a deadline). They offer to give a notification when the new version is available, when you sign up to the Fangs mailing list <http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fangs-release> at lists.sourceforge.net. But as you can see in my FANGS-screenshot <http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/berkeley-images/fang-new.gif> of the testmodel-page, the result in Fangs is pretty the same as in the "View > No-style" option which you can see in all FF-versions. Additional: - In the w3c html-validator there is an option "Outline". Very easy checkpoint: at the bottom of the result page they give the page-structure as found in the headings ( = schematical representation of the highlighted items in Fangs).. - I tried the testmodelpage in the online Lynx Viewer <http://www.delorie.com/web/lynxview.html> ("This service allows web authors to see what their pages will look like (sort of) when viewed with Lynx, a text-mode web browser"). And, o wonder!, this gives exacty the same output as the No-style version. - For testing accessibility in Lynx (and other browsers), there is a Lynx-emulation option in the Cynthia says testing page <http://www.contentquality.com/mynewtester/cynthia.exe>. >We have other plans (which were not implemented in the navigation snippet I >shared with the list) to increase the accessibility of this site by creating >access keys >(http://diveintoaccessibility.org/day_15_defining_keyboard_shortcuts.html) > > Adding access keys: good thing too! >and by creating a "skip to main content" >(http://www.jimthatcher.com/skipnav.htm) link--I think it might be helpful >to indicate in your links that the "Calendar of Intercollegiate Golf Events >2006" is the "Main content". >Thanks again! >Allison > > Yes: in fact the first link in the No-style version of the testpage is the "skip to main content"-link, but this can be refined and better represented. Like starting with the text: "Welcome at the text edition of this page. You can <link>skip to the main content</link>: Calendar of Intercollegiate Golf Events 2006. The rest of this page consists of menu's for navigating to other parts of this site. The list of possible menu's is: .... <list with links>." or something like that. Greetings, francky ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
