Eric A. Meyer wrote: > And always remember that this is a > beta!
They probably will fix their position:absolute bugs in gamma or delta. Absolutely positioned element and percentage width http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/apboxpercentagewidth.html wrong Absolutely positioned box and lost next margin http://www.brunildo.org/test/IEWapie2.html wrong z-index on a.p. elements within r.p.parents http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/escher.html wrong Absolutely positioned element with auto offset: the static position http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/apstaticposition.html wrong http://www.brunildo.org/test/IE_rel_abs.html absolute positioning inside a relative element first block wrong Floats and disappearing absolutely positioned divs http://www.brunildo.org/test/IE_raf3.html wrong in Example 1,2, 15 / corrected in Example 6,7 If someone could check these too before I add them to the Wiki, I'd appreciate it. IE7b2 still has no clue what a containing block is, and z-index seems to be difficult to read in the specs. And the 'layout' problem still wins over the specs. Ingo -- http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
