At 08:30 AM 1/25/2006, Stephen R Laniel wrote:
>Just to be clear, it's a totally reasonable thing to expect
>from CSS. It would be nice to be able to define
>
>h[0-9] {
> font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;
>}
>
>instead of the ungainly
>
>h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, h7, h8, h9 {
> font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;
>}
Perhaps, but please find another example. The h1-h6* tags are the
only instances of numbered tags in HTML; surely you wouldn't add
RegExp to CSS for just that.
Would you really want to be able to write CSS rules like this?
d(iv|l)(.|#)cont(act|ent) (p(re){0,1}|dt)
{
border(-.+){0,1}: 1px solid #000;
}
Is it that you think stylesheets are too easy to proofread today and
you're looking for more challenge?
I can see the advantage of using variables in rule values, but I'd
want to see us plumb the depths of CSS2 & CSS3 selectors before
looking for further complication.
Regards,
Paul
*PS: Where did h7-h9 come from?
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
