francky wrote: > Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > > >>>>> <http://www.stoneladder.ca/sandbox/lbk/index.html> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> [...] >> >> > got an idea ... > > [...] > <http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/test-lionbear.htm>. > > francky > > I've got an idea, too. But I forgot it. In the meantime, both methods hold +3(that alone is difficult.) and break on +4. If push came to shove, I'd go with the /simpler/ css solution(top version) regardless of the oversize font factor in IE. Just my opinion, of course... Sincerely, Alfred Knopf
-- Typography exists to honor content. --Robert Bringhurst <http://www.dlaakso.com/> ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
