Geoffrey Alan Colbath wrote: > I'm in the process of converting a CSS from using absolute positioning > to something a little more flexible, since we are trying to develop a > CMS for the site, and would like the content to be a little more fluid, > so we can add tools here and there. > > The page I'm using as a guinea pig is: > http://id.iit.edu/~colbath/work/ExternalSiteRedux/Geoff/1.1.html > > And my CSS (so far) is: > http://id.iit.edu/~colbath/work/ExternalSiteRedux/include/gcStyles2.css > > The only problem I seem to be having in the conversion, is the position > of the main body DIV, which is out of alignment in FF and WAY out of > alignment in IE. > > Any insight would be MUCH appreciated... > > > Thanks! > > -=gc=- > > > > Geoffrey, Looks better than it did yesterday, that's for sure. This is one way you might deal with it<http://dlaakso.com/2c-in-2c-horznav.html>, although probably more complex than necessary for your needs. The point is, it really is not necessary to use absolute positioning-- that and setting height on containers, alway creates problems. Not using pixel based mouse type helps, too. HTH ~davidLaakso
-- Typography exists to honor content. --Robert Bringhurst <http://www.dlaakso.com/> ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
