> I am aware that it is not a 100% correct way to do it using css... and > having therefore a horrible link. But it is a quick, nice and > attractive way of experimenting what can be done with css which is not > purely what the manuals say. I mean, it is a trick to overcome a > problem that will not lead to perfect code, but nice results. > > Anyway, I'm with you. A page which is not experimental, but > profesional and serious should not use it, and use javascript instead.
Hence my reminder about the nature of this trick. Personally I wonder if it not time to stop trying to constantly be on the bleeding edge (where people imitating what they see without knowing what it does do indeed bleed) and concentrate on best practices for a professional environment instead. I know experimentation breeds new ideas and new best practices, but it should be made far more obvious that some tricks are just there to prove that something is possible. A "beta" label or something like that would help - it is a common term in software development and gives your CSS tricks such web 2.0 feel :-) ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
