I wasn't raising a problem. I already have a javascript solution in place for my website and you even included the part of my email where I mention I'm already aware of javascript solutions, whether custom or plugin.
My email is raising a question about the way in which style sheets are used and supported by browsers, not a design problem I'm having. Thanks. |================================| | Bill Brown | | Webmaster, MacNimble.com | | http://www.macnimble.com | | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Phone: 215-237-2037 | |================================| > -----Original Message----- > From: jack fredricks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 5:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Subject: Re: [css-d] Style Families > > > There's javascript, sure. Couldn't we also try to advocate the > > introduction of something like familied style sheets > though? And then > > allow a browser to specify an active stylesheet for each family, > > rather than just one active stylesheet? > > It's very early here in Oz, and I might have missed a > critical part of your question (please forgive me if I have). > > It sounds to me as if bodyswitching will solve your problem. No? > > http://www.alistapart.com/articles/bodyswitchers/ > ___________________________________________________________ $0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer 10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more. Signup at www.doteasy.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
