Chris W. Parker wrote: > Hello, > > I'm just now experimenting with 'position: relative;' and I've come to > find out that even when I place an element outside a <div> (with > relatively positioned elements inside it) it is still pushed below the > point where the positioned elements WOULD have been (had they not been > positioned).
This does not sound wrong. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#choose-position "When a box B is relatively positioned, the position of the following box is calculated as though B were not offset." > So now it seems that I have to relatively position ALL the elements in > IE that come after my initial positioned elements if I want to fill the > gap. Firefox doesn't exhibit this behavior. There's got to be a work > around for this or it's also possible that I'm doing something wrong. If Fx does show a different behavior, then most probably Fx is correct. I suspect the elements inside to be floated? > I'd submit a link but my page is on a test server that can't be reached > from the outside. Then you have a problem in getting help from those who do not have access to a crystal ball. Ingo -- http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
