> Ingo Chao wrote: > > > in [1], you have two solutions, but in Jack's case, only 4:onclick > > handler worked for me, not 3:negative z-index. > > > > Maybe another bug is interfering. I've tried a similar approach as with > > links not working when placed over an absolutely positioned element with > > a filter [2]. > > > > http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/noclick.html > > > > This requires an additional inner wrapper of the a.p. link with the > > dimensions of the image. But here, the negative z-index does the trick. > > Yes, that's interesting. > If the anchor has 'layout' but not position:absolute, then position:absolute > (or relative as well) and z-index:-1 on the image solves the IE5.0 problem, > without the need of an extra wrapper. But with position:absolute on the > anchor this doesn't work anymore (the stacking changes), so an extra wrapper > seems necessary (unless one wants to use javascript.) > > Bruno
thank you all. I'll play with all this on the weekend and see if I can get it working 'fully'. I'm glad others had problems with this, as it's the first bug in a while that caused me real pain. re http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/noclick.html thanks for the sample. One thing though - might need to set cursor:hand on that link for IE5.0. The cursor doesn't change on :hover, just another sign that some kind of problem persists. thanks again jack ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
