> The build-up of elements and styles in your page is a bit too complex > for my taste...
Totally fair. It is a personal site, so I tend to be more experimental than I would on a page for someone else. My next phase of debugging was to isolate the problem somewhere outside of a content area involving border-wrappers and three negatively-margined regions. > Alternatively: 'position: absolute' can be used on the image in the same > container. I'm not totally sure, but it seems this method would rely on consistent height, something I can't guarantee. (at least with floats you can do FnE, and then drop in a quicky clearing element...) > I think the background-image process and multiple elements is > unnecessary, as styling the image itself as a float with negative > back-side margins will work well in a wrapped container with 'overflow: > hidden'. > > <http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_chaos_18.html> I hadn't seen this method before, I'll definitely experiment with it, thanks. I realise the background-image trick is an awful kludge, so I'm glad to hear that there's a way to get float-right behaving that way in non-Moz clients. Mike ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
