Els wrote: > I think that's a warning though, not an error? A quite annoying > warning though, and it would be good if there was an option to > specify which warnings we're interested in, so these 'transparent > warnings' could be omitted.
If you use the "Advanced" interface: <http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator-uri> you can choose which warnings to receive. I normally set it to "No warnings" as the warnings are always stupid things about "not having a background-color with a color" and are, frankly, more trouble than they're worth. For the curious, there's a list of known problems at <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=CSSValidator> The original line-height problem that started this thread has apparently been fixed, and will be moved to production Real Soon Now: <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2272> (see last comment) Now, back to that deadline I'm going to miss... Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
